We took a look at some of the budget numbers in California at www.scabee.com/statepay
where you can find the salary of most any state employee. We don't know of anyone there except Arnold and he's probably working for one dollar anyway. But we got to thinking if Calfornia was similar to some of the east coast states that have budget problems. So we picked a department like "Industrial Relations" and asked to see who made over $100k annually. 347 names popped up. We went to a bunch of other departments and each one had pages of people pulling down in excess of $100k. Now think about this. Each one of these people will retire early and get a hefty benefit filled pension for years after they leave their job so hard working stiffs like you and I that aren't so lucky support that gravy train for the rest of our breathing days. Something is wrong here and it only seems to be getting worse. The town I live at near the beach just decided that it wouldn't be nice to lay off any government workers or cut back on the budget (they are having fun building new everything) so they just announced a their completion of a new revaluation of homes proposing that our house receive a 42% increase in property taxes from $5,578 to $7,908 per year. Now don't think that we had a low assessment previously, we didn't. Everyone in the neighborhood is getting stiffed and our house is only a 1000 sq ft built some 50 years ago. Something wrong here. This reminds us of the decline of the former USSR. Are we on our way?
Tuesday, February 17, 2009
Wednesday, February 11, 2009
Ding Dongs Policing the Wing Bats
Today the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection issued a press release stating that it had fined Del Monte Corp. nearly $3,500 for industrial wastewater violations last fall at its plant in South Centre Township, Columbia County.
Think about this process. Nearly every week PADEP issues a similar announcement. After weeks and weeks of behind the scenes work involving scientists, engineers, administrative staff, lawyers and then finally the PR people they announce this huge event. Probably the costs for the involved lawyers alone exceeded $10,000 in this one example and its not unreasonable to believe that after every government worker got involved they expended $50,000 chasing this down.
But take a look at the numbers. Del Monte had $3.7 billion in revenue last year and was fined $3,500 - How about putting that through the canine smell test?
Pretend as a fully employed citizen you have an income of $45,000 per year and were fined a similar percentage. What would that fine be? It would be .00000094 times your income which equals $0.0423 Yes that's a FOUR CENTS equivalent
Now if you get caught speeding, roll through a stop sign or make a left where you can only go right the total fines often exceed $150 and that hits your budget. That's close to 20 % of your weekly take home pay.
Here polluters get caugt and end up paying the equivalent of $ .04 - we need to fix the system.
Think about this process. Nearly every week PADEP issues a similar announcement. After weeks and weeks of behind the scenes work involving scientists, engineers, administrative staff, lawyers and then finally the PR people they announce this huge event. Probably the costs for the involved lawyers alone exceeded $10,000 in this one example and its not unreasonable to believe that after every government worker got involved they expended $50,000 chasing this down.
But take a look at the numbers. Del Monte had $3.7 billion in revenue last year and was fined $3,500 - How about putting that through the canine smell test?
Pretend as a fully employed citizen you have an income of $45,000 per year and were fined a similar percentage. What would that fine be? It would be .00000094 times your income which equals $0.0423 Yes that's a FOUR CENTS equivalent
Now if you get caught speeding, roll through a stop sign or make a left where you can only go right the total fines often exceed $150 and that hits your budget. That's close to 20 % of your weekly take home pay.
Here polluters get caugt and end up paying the equivalent of $ .04 - we need to fix the system.
Three Strikes Your Out
In some sports the rules are so simple that four year old kids can grasp the baiscs of the game instantly. That can't be said for the bankers on Wall Street. Today we learn that Merrill Lynch gave $3.6 billion in bonuses to some 39,000 employees just before the merger with Bank of America last year. Seems like we need to apply some good old baseball rules here. ML execs took a wild swing last year and missed the ball again. Our umpire says the execs need to be kicked out of the game. That is what they are making of all of this. Yes, kicked out of the job and retroactively taxed the entire amont of their bonus plus adding, as they say at Bank of America, a slight additional service fee say 25% would be appropriate.
Tuesday, February 10, 2009
Wal-Mart to Slash Staff by 800
OK We might not be the brightest guys on the block. But when will the media give it a break?
Everyone quickly reported these job cuts while the market tanked today. Let's put on our thinking hats and apply Bassic Math 101.
800 jobs out of 2,000,000 Wal-Mart employees. That's 4/100 ths of a percent.
Look at it another way. Say your take home pay was $1,000.00 per week. If you applied the same percentage cut 4/100 ths to that take home pay you would be bringing home $999.60
BFD Big Freakin Deal !
Everyone quickly reported these job cuts while the market tanked today. Let's put on our thinking hats and apply Bassic Math 101.
800 jobs out of 2,000,000 Wal-Mart employees. That's 4/100 ths of a percent.
Look at it another way. Say your take home pay was $1,000.00 per week. If you applied the same percentage cut 4/100 ths to that take home pay you would be bringing home $999.60
BFD Big Freakin Deal !
Tuesday, February 3, 2009
Taxes, Taxes, Taxes Who Pays Taxes ?
Seems like not to many Washington big shots are paying their taxes. Ya know, the odds are amazing. Compare this. millions of people buy Powerball tickets each week dreaming to be a winner. Sometimes a few weeks pass, millions and millions of tickets and no winner. The country has 300 million people. We picka few people for top government posts and each one has a tax problem. What are the odds?
Back here we feel like jackasses not dogs because we pay our taxes every year. What gives?
Maybe the obtuse answer is that the tax system is so complex and overly complicated that most of the brilliant people simply can't figure it out and make mistakes. Nawh, I don't think so.
By the way did you notice that this Nacny Killiefer has three people working at home for her. Two nannies and a personal assistant. Sure glad were putting common folk into these jobs so that they just might understand what its like to not know how you will pay next weeks bills.
Back here we feel like jackasses not dogs because we pay our taxes every year. What gives?
Maybe the obtuse answer is that the tax system is so complex and overly complicated that most of the brilliant people simply can't figure it out and make mistakes. Nawh, I don't think so.
By the way did you notice that this Nacny Killiefer has three people working at home for her. Two nannies and a personal assistant. Sure glad were putting common folk into these jobs so that they just might understand what its like to not know how you will pay next weeks bills.
Saturday, January 31, 2009
Are We The Only One's Paying Our Taxes?
Now let's get this straight. The person we pick to be in charge of the Treasury is so smart that he he failed to pay more than $34,000 in social security and medicare taxes while working at the International Monetary Fund. And that he didn't even pay the Social Security and Medicare tax he owed for 2001 and 2002 until after he just recently became a nominee for Treasury secretary. Smart guy!
And days later we learn that Tom Daschle, President Barack Obama's choice for secretary of Health and Human Services, forgot (is that the right term) to pay about $140,000 in back taxes and interest until he was being considered for his new appointment. Sure it is only natural to have consulting income and get confused about whether it should be reported or not.
What are we stupid? From now on it is Mr. Tax Cheat not Mr. Secretary.
And days later we learn that Tom Daschle, President Barack Obama's choice for secretary of Health and Human Services, forgot (is that the right term) to pay about $140,000 in back taxes and interest until he was being considered for his new appointment. Sure it is only natural to have consulting income and get confused about whether it should be reported or not.
What are we stupid? From now on it is Mr. Tax Cheat not Mr. Secretary.
Monday, January 26, 2009
Our new column will be an ongoing look at organizational growth in order to see if there is any similarity between how The Peter Principle as presented in Dr. Laurence Peter’s book with the same name described how Every employee tens to rise to his level of Incompetence and our own BIG is BAD theory that might apply to organizations growing to a size that almost guarantees failure.
Think about how, as a generalization, most companies focus on the “How do we get bigger” with the mindset that such automatically translates to Better. Perhaps it is an outgrowth of the Bigger is Better thought process we saw in the 1960’s and 1970’s. Bigger computer centers were better. Then we figured out how all that could fit in a box rather than a building. We also thought that Bigger car’s were better as evidenced by some of the largest tailfins imaginable. If it came from Texas, then the biggest state it was better. And I won’t even talk about body parts!
Probably the example of all time is Enron a great company in its early years that through wild unbridled growth simply got out of control to the point of where management didn’t even care about right or wrong. Just become the biggest and tell everyone you were the best!
How about the Big three automakers? Each year sell more cars to feed the old dinosaur. Don’t plan for what the market will need. Don’t sell what people will buy. Just keep pumping out more and more of what makes a profit for management. Keep making bigger numbers so that the shareholders will believe we are the best.
And talk about housing. Another market so insulated from real world conditions. You have a reasonably successful business building reasonable homes in a region of the country. Let’s apply the new theory of growth to our business. We will span out to a dozen new regional markets and build three times as many homes as before. In order to do that we will help finance anybody with a heartbeat. Sell them the stars and the moon. And in the meantime rather than build a corporate nest egg for the future we will pull tons of money out of the business and pay key management millions in dollars in compensation. Hey, they deserve it because they made bigger numbers. Now they go beg for a government subsidy.
And what about all those big box hardware stores. Same model. Start out with a manageable business employing construction experts that can help our customers. Then get bigger and bigger. In the process cut out most of the professional help, keep the store as clean as my dirty garage, reduce the variety of products, open one of twenty cash registers and then give the guy in charge a $200 million dollar payoff for making big numbers that don’t work. Let’s calculate how that $200 million could have paid the salary of some 6,000 people for the next year. Big didn’t work here either.
And finally need we talk about banking? The worlds biggest banks with the worlds smartest bankers pumped the bubble beyond what the imagination could dream. So big, so strong, so smart that simple people and even government regulators couldn’t even comprehend what was happening. They made The Notorious B.I.G. look small! So what do we have? A total collapse, lack of accountability, a taxpayer bailout and dismissed executives selling their homes to spouses for the price of an expensive waste basket to avoid the man.
My local baker didn’t do all of the crap. He’s pretty darn smart looking back at what happened. He’s small in size but big in performance. And so is my local hardware store. Been there for half a century or more. Always helpful with great service and unbelievable supply. Some people go there when they know the Big guys won’t have that particular item. I go there all the time to just to give him more business so that he can remain BIG in our little neighborhood.
Think about how, as a generalization, most companies focus on the “How do we get bigger” with the mindset that such automatically translates to Better. Perhaps it is an outgrowth of the Bigger is Better thought process we saw in the 1960’s and 1970’s. Bigger computer centers were better. Then we figured out how all that could fit in a box rather than a building. We also thought that Bigger car’s were better as evidenced by some of the largest tailfins imaginable. If it came from Texas, then the biggest state it was better. And I won’t even talk about body parts!
Probably the example of all time is Enron a great company in its early years that through wild unbridled growth simply got out of control to the point of where management didn’t even care about right or wrong. Just become the biggest and tell everyone you were the best!
How about the Big three automakers? Each year sell more cars to feed the old dinosaur. Don’t plan for what the market will need. Don’t sell what people will buy. Just keep pumping out more and more of what makes a profit for management. Keep making bigger numbers so that the shareholders will believe we are the best.
And talk about housing. Another market so insulated from real world conditions. You have a reasonably successful business building reasonable homes in a region of the country. Let’s apply the new theory of growth to our business. We will span out to a dozen new regional markets and build three times as many homes as before. In order to do that we will help finance anybody with a heartbeat. Sell them the stars and the moon. And in the meantime rather than build a corporate nest egg for the future we will pull tons of money out of the business and pay key management millions in dollars in compensation. Hey, they deserve it because they made bigger numbers. Now they go beg for a government subsidy.
And what about all those big box hardware stores. Same model. Start out with a manageable business employing construction experts that can help our customers. Then get bigger and bigger. In the process cut out most of the professional help, keep the store as clean as my dirty garage, reduce the variety of products, open one of twenty cash registers and then give the guy in charge a $200 million dollar payoff for making big numbers that don’t work. Let’s calculate how that $200 million could have paid the salary of some 6,000 people for the next year. Big didn’t work here either.
And finally need we talk about banking? The worlds biggest banks with the worlds smartest bankers pumped the bubble beyond what the imagination could dream. So big, so strong, so smart that simple people and even government regulators couldn’t even comprehend what was happening. They made The Notorious B.I.G. look small! So what do we have? A total collapse, lack of accountability, a taxpayer bailout and dismissed executives selling their homes to spouses for the price of an expensive waste basket to avoid the man.
My local baker didn’t do all of the crap. He’s pretty darn smart looking back at what happened. He’s small in size but big in performance. And so is my local hardware store. Been there for half a century or more. Always helpful with great service and unbelievable supply. Some people go there when they know the Big guys won’t have that particular item. I go there all the time to just to give him more business so that he can remain BIG in our little neighborhood.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
